IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v60y2025i3p1373-1400_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mutual Funds’ Conditional Performance Free of Data Snooping Bias

Author

Listed:
  • Hsu, Po-Hsuan
  • Kyriakou, Ioannis
  • Ma, Tren
  • Sermpinis, Georgios

Abstract

We introduce a test to assess mutual funds’ “conditional” performance that is based on updated information and corrects data snooping bias. Our method, named the functional false discovery rate “plus” ( $ {\mathrm{fFDR}}^{+} $ ), incorporates fund characteristics in estimating fund performance free of data snooping bias. Simulations suggest that the $ {\mathrm{fFDR}}^{+} $ controls well the ratio of false discoveries and gains considerable power over prior methods that do not account for extra information. Portfolios of funds selected by the $ {\mathrm{fFDR}}^{+} $ outperform other tests not accounting for information updating, highlighting the importance of evaluating mutual funds from a conditional perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Kyriakou, Ioannis & Ma, Tren & Sermpinis, Georgios, 2025. "Mutual Funds’ Conditional Performance Free of Data Snooping Bias," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 60(3), pages 1373-1400, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:60:y:2025:i:3:p:1373-1400_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109024000097/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:60:y:2025:i:3:p:1373-1400_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.