IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v56y2021i6p1908-1944_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Orientation and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from State-Level Adoption of Constituency Statutes

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Huasheng
  • Li, Kai
  • Ma, Yujing

Abstract

We examine the causal effect of stakeholder orientation on firms’ cost of debt. Our test exploits the staggered state-level adoption of constituency statutes, which allows directors to consider stakeholders’ interests when making business decisions. We find a significant drop in loan spreads for firms incorporated in states that adopted such statutes relative to firms incorporated elsewhere. We further show that constituency statutes reduce the cost of debt through the channels of mitigating conflicts of interest between residual and fixed claimants and between holders of liquid claims and holders of illiquid claims, limiting legal liability and lowering takeover threats.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Huasheng & Li, Kai & Ma, Yujing, 2021. "Stakeholder Orientation and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from State-Level Adoption of Constituency Statutes," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(6), pages 1908-1944, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:56:y:2021:i:6:p:1908-1944_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109020000605/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:56:y:2021:i:6:p:1908-1944_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.