IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v56y2021i3p745-787_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Analysts and Their Employers Value Access to Management? Evidence from Earnings Conference Call Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Cen, Ling
  • Chen, Jing
  • Dasgupta, Sudipto
  • Ragunathan, Vanitha

Abstract

The literature examining analyst activity assumes that access to management is valued by analysts and their employers. We propose a readily observable measure of access: How often an analyst is invited to be among the first to ask questions in the Q&A session of an earnings conference call. These “early participants” are more successful in the labor market than peers from the same brokerage when their brokerages close. Our results show that access is valued by both sell-side and buy-side employers and reflects connectivity to management as well as analyst skill dimensions not captured in traditional measures of performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Cen, Ling & Chen, Jing & Dasgupta, Sudipto & Ragunathan, Vanitha, 2021. "Do Analysts and Their Employers Value Access to Management? Evidence from Earnings Conference Call Participation," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(3), pages 745-787, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:56:y:2021:i:3:p:745-787_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109020000198/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Perico Ortiz, Daniel & Schnaubelt, Matthias & Seifert, Oleg, 2023. "A topic modeling perspective on investor uncertainty," FAU Discussion Papers in Economics 04/2023, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Economics.
    2. Setterberg, Hanna & Sjöström, Emma, 2021. "Action Lab: Integrated Communications on Financial and ESG Performance in the Earnings Call," Misum Working Paper Series 2021-1, Stockholm School of Economics, Mistra Center for Sustainable Markets (Misum).
    3. Tim Martens & Christoph J. Sextroh, 2021. "Analyst Coverage Overlaps and Interfirm Information Spillovers," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 1425-1480, September.
    4. Justin Birru & Sinan Gokkaya & Xi Liu & René M. Stulz, 2022. "Are Analyst Short‐Term Trade Ideas Valuable?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(3), pages 1829-1875, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:56:y:2021:i:3:p:745-787_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.