IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v45y2011i06p1563-1590_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Sensitivity of American Options to Suboptimal Exercise Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Ibáñez, Alfredo
  • Paraskevopoulos, Ioannis

Abstract

The value of American options depends on the exercise policy followed by option holders. Market frictions, risk aversion, or a misspecified model, for example, can result in suboptimal behavior. We study the sensitivity of American options to suboptimal exercise strategies. We show that this measure is given by the Gamma of the American option at the optimal exercise boundary. More precisely, “if B is the optimal exercise price, but exercise is either brought forward when or delayed until a price B̃ has been reached, the cost of suboptimal exercise is given by ½ × Γ ( B ) × ( B − B̃ ) 2 , where Γ ( B ) denotes the American option Gamma.” Therefore, the cost of suboptimal exercise is second-order in the bias of the exercise policy and depends on Gamma. This result provides new insights on American options.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibáñez, Alfredo & Paraskevopoulos, Ioannis, 2011. "The Sensitivity of American Options to Suboptimal Exercise Strategies," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(06), pages 1563-1590, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:45:y:2011:i:06:p:1563-1590_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S002210901000058X
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:eee:ejores:v:263:y:2017:i:2:p:698-706 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Fabozzi, Frank J. & Paletta, Tommaso & Stanescu, Silvia & Tunaru, Radu, 2016. "An improved method for pricing and hedging long dated American options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 656-666.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:45:y:2011:i:06:p:1563-1590_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Keith Waters). General contact details of provider: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_JFQ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.