IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v9y2022i3p296-313_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

All in This Together? A Preregistered Report on Deservingness of Government Aid During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Bridgman, Aengus
  • Merkley, Eric
  • Loewen, Peter John
  • Owen, Taylor
  • Ruths, Derek

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed unprecedented pressure on governments to engage in widespread cash transfers directly to citizens to help mitigate economic losses. Major and near-universal redistribution efforts have been deployed, but there is remarkably little understanding of where the mass public believes financial support is warranted. Using experimental evidence, we evaluate whether considerations related to deservingness, similarity, and prejudicial attitudes structure support for these transfers. A preregistered experiment found broad, generous, and nondiscriminatory support for direct cash transfers related to COVID-19 in Canada. The second study, accepted as a preregistered report, further probes these dynamics by comparing COVID-19-related outlays with nonemergency ones. We find that COVID-19-related spending was more universal as compared to a more generic cash allocation program. Given that the results were driven by the income of hypothetical recipients, we find broad support for disaster relief that is not means-tested or otherwise constrained by pre-disaster income.

Suggested Citation

  • Bridgman, Aengus & Merkley, Eric & Loewen, Peter John & Owen, Taylor & Ruths, Derek, 2022. "All in This Together? A Preregistered Report on Deservingness of Government Aid During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 296-313, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:9:y:2022:i:3:p:296-313_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263021000105/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:9:y:2022:i:3:p:296-313_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.