IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v25y1993i02p106-118_01.html

Multidimensional Evaluation of Flexible Functional Forms for Production Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ornelas, Fermin S.
  • Shumway, C. Richard

Abstract

Several common flexible functional forms are evaluated for Texas agricultural production utilizing three procedures. Nested hypothesis tests indicate that the normalized quadratic is the marginally-preferred functional form followed by the generalized Leontief. Predictive accuracy results are ambiguous between the generalized Leontief and the normalized quadratic. Statistical performance favors the normalized quadratic. These two functional forms consistently dominate the translog.

Suggested Citation

  • Ornelas, Fermin S. & Shumway, C. Richard, 1993. "Multidimensional Evaluation of Flexible Functional Forms for Production Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 106-118, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:25:y:1993:i:02:p:106-118_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1074070800019003/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krishna Paudel & Christopher McIntosh, 2005. "Numeraire choice in agricultural supply analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(11), pages 1209-1214.
    2. Tzouvelekas, Evaggelos, 2000. "Approximation Properties and Estimation of the Translog Production Function with Panel Data," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 1(01), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Shumway, C. Richard, 1995. "Recent Duality Contributions In Production Economics," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 20(01), pages 1-17, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:25:y:1993:i:02:p:106-118_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.