IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v22y1990i02p209-216_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hedging Risk For Feeder Cattle With A Traditional Hedge Compared To A Ratio Hedge

Author

Listed:
  • Elam, Emmett
  • Davis, James

Abstract

This paper compares hedging risk for various weights of feeder cattle hedged with a traditional cross hedge and a ratio cross hedge. A traditional hedge calls for the purchase/sale of one pound of futures for each pound of cash feeder cattle. By contrast, a ratio hedge requires estimation of a hedge ratio to determine the number of pounds of futures needed to hedge one pound of cash feeder cattle. Hedge ratios were found to be larger than 1.0 for light-weight feeder cattle. By using the estimated hedge ratios, it was shown that hedging risk could be reduced 20-50 percent compared to that achieved by using a hedge ratio of 1.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Elam, Emmett & Davis, James, 1990. "Hedging Risk For Feeder Cattle With A Traditional Hedge Compared To A Ratio Hedge," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 209-216, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:22:y:1990:i:02:p:209-216_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1074070800001954/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maples, William & Harri, Ardian & Riley, John Michael & Tack, Jesse & Williams, Brian, 2016. "Determining the Effectiveness of Exchange Traded Funds as a Risk Management Tool for Southeastern Producers," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 229979, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Shafer, Carl E., 1992. "Hedge Ratios and Basis Behavior: An Intuitive Insight?," Faculty Paper Series 257887, Texas A&M University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    3. Brake, William & Anderson, John D. & Coffey, Brian K., 2006. "Geographic and Seasonal Differences in the Feeder Cattle Hedging Risk," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35325, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Diersen, Matthew A. & Klein, Nicole L., 2000. "Price Discovery For Stocker Cattle Futures And Options," 2000 Conference, April 17-18 2000, Chicago, Illinois 18940, NCR-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
    5. Coffey, Brian K. & Anderson, John D. & Parcell, Joseph L., 2002. "Spatial Analysis Of Feeder Cattle Hedging Risk," 2002 Annual Meeting, July 28-31, 2002, Long Beach, California 36586, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    6. Bina, Justin D. & Schroeder, Ted C. & Tonsor, Glynn T., 2022. "Conditional feeder cattle hedge ratios: Cross hedging with fluctuating corn prices," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:22:y:1990:i:02:p:209-216_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.