IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v12y1980i02p65-69_01.html

Estimating Linear Probability Functions: A Comparison of Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Debertin, David L.
  • Pagoulatos, Angelos
  • Smith, Eldon D.

Abstract

A linear probability function permits the estimation of the probability of the occurrence or non-occurrence of a discrete event. Nerlove and Press (p. 3–9) outline several statistical problems that arise if such a function is estimated via OLS. In particular, heteroskedasticity inherent in such a regression model leads to inefficient estimates of parameters (Amemiya 1973, Horn and Horn). Moreover, without restrictions on the conventional OLS model, probability estimates lying outside the unit (0–1) interval are possible (Nerlove and Press). Goldberger and Kmenta suggest two approaches for alleviating the heteroskedasticity problems inherent in the OLS regression model. Logit analysis will also alleviate heteroskedasticity problems and ensure that estimated probabilities will lie within the unit interval (Amemiya 1974, Hauck and Donner, Hill and Kau, Horn and Horn, Horn, Horn, and Duncan, Theil 1970).

Suggested Citation

  • Debertin, David L. & Pagoulatos, Angelos & Smith, Eldon D., 1980. "Estimating Linear Probability Functions: A Comparison of Approaches," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 65-69, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:12:y:1980:i:02:p:65-69_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0081305200015636/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kusmin, Lorin D., 1994. "Factors Associated with the Growth of Local and Regional Economies: A Review of Selected Empirical Literature," Staff Reports 278733, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Kriesel, Warren & McNamara, Kevin T., 1991. "A County-Level Model Of Manufacturing Plant Recruitment With Improved Industrial Site Quality Measurement," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(01), pages 1-7, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:12:y:1980:i:02:p:65-69_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.