IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jadres/v40y2000i06p95-100_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Investigation of Advertising Wearin and Wearout

Author

Listed:
  • Blair, Margaret Henderson

Abstract

For many years, advertisers and researchers have been debating over the issues of advertising wearm and advertising weavout. The wearm proponents have held that the power of advertising builds over time and with repeated exposures; that there is a “wearing-in†process which occurs between the advertising and the consumer; and, that this effectiveness cannot be measured with a single exposure or at a single point in time. There are at least two sides to the wearout debate. One side argues that the selling power of advertising declines, or wears out, over time and exposures; while others suggest that “world class†advertising does not.

Suggested Citation

  • Blair, Margaret Henderson, 2000. "An Empirical Investigation of Advertising Wearin and Wearout," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(6), pages 95-100, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jadres:v:40:y:2000:i:06:p:95-100_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0021849900000155/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Smith, Liam D.G. & Curtis, Jim & Mair, Judith & van Dijk, Pieter A., 2012. "Requests for zoo visitors to undertake pro-wildlife behaviour: How many is too many?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1502-1510.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jadres:v:40:y:2000:i:06:p:95-100_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.