IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v7y1953i2p300-300_21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commonwealth Consultative Committee for South and Southeast Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Anonymous

Abstract

The first report of the Commonwealth Consultative Committee for South and Southeast Asia (the Colombo Plan) was released in May 1952. The Korean conflict, it was noted, had had the short-term effect of improving the balance of trade of countries in the area through increasing volume and prices of exports. As a result, the trade deficits expected when the original plans were drawn up, turned out to be surpluses; increased volume of public revenue had enabled governments to spend more on development projects, in some cases financed wholly from their own resources. Expenditures of the first year of the plan had been appreciably greater than in 1950–1951. Since the end of 1951, however, economic conditions had again changed. Terms of trade were less favorable with a decline in export prices for raw materials. Government contributions for 1952–1953, therefore, were expected to be smaller than in 1951–1952. At the same time, planned expenditures for 1952–1953 were greater than before, due partly to increased costs and partly to additional projects. Unless conditions became “very adverse†, there was a “reasonable expectation†that next year's program would be successfully completed; finances were expected to come from accumulated budget surpluses, internal loans, increased private savings, private foreign investments and loans from other governments and from the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. As for future years, the report noted that success would depend in part on the determination of the countries involved, careful planning of projects, continuance of the cooperative spirit in which the plan was begun, and technical and capital assistance.

Suggested Citation

  • Anonymous, 1953. "Commonwealth Consultative Committee for South and Southeast Asia," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 300-300, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:7:y:1953:i:2:p:300-300_21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818300021986/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:7:y:1953:i:2:p:300-300_21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.