IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v50y1996i02p325-347_02.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Norms, culture, and world politics: insights from sociology's institutionalism

Author

Listed:
  • Finnemore, Martha

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Finnemore, Martha, 1996. "Norms, culture, and world politics: insights from sociology's institutionalism," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(02), pages 325-347, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:50:y:1996:i:02:p:325-347_02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0020818300028587
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Higgott, 2012. "The Utility and Limits of the ‘European Model’ for the Regional Institutionalization of East Asia," Chapters,in: Asian Responses to the Global Financial Crisis, chapter 15 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Swidler, Ann & Watkins, Susan Cotts, 2009. ""Teach a Man to Fish": The Sustainability Doctrine and Its Social Consequences," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 1182-1196, July.
    3. van der Ven Hamish, 2014. "Socializing the C-suite: why some big-box retailers are “greener” than others," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 31-63, April.
    4. Felix Anderl, 2016. "The myth of the local," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 197-218, June.
    5. Gulrajani, Nilima, 2010. "Challenging global accountability: the intersection of contracts and culture in the World Bank," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 30045, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. May-Britt Stumbaum, 2015. "The diffusion of norms in security-related fields: views from China, India and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 331-347, September.
    7. Michael Lipson, 2017. "Miriam Bradley. 2016. Protecting civilians in war: The ICRC, UNHCR, and their limitations in internal armed conflicts (Oxford: Oxford University Press)," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 147-150, March.
    8. Pinheiro, Diogo & Chwieroth, Jeffrey & Hicks, Alexander, 2015. "Do international non-governmental organizations inhibit globalization? the case of capital account liberalization in developing countries," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 63669, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Antje Wiener & Guido Schwellnus, 2004. "Contested Norms in the Process of EU Enlargement: Non-Discrimination and Minority Rights," The Constitutionalism Web-Papers p0009, University of Hamburg, Faculty for Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Social Sciences, Institute of Political Science.
    10. Michaela Balzarova & Pavel Castka, 2012. "Stakeholders’ Influence and Contribution to Social Standards Development: The Case of Multiple Stakeholder Approach to ISO 26000 Development," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 265-279, December.
    11. Belinda Townsend & Erik Martin & Hans Löfgren & Evelyne de Leeuw, 2012. "Global Health Governance: Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the Doha Declaration, and Democratisation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 2(2), pages 1-17, May.
    12. William Hynes & Patrick Holden, 2012. "What future for the Global Aid for Trade Initiative? Towards a fairer assessment of its achievements and limitations," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp421, IIIS.
    13. Schmidt, Vivien A., 2013. "Does discourse matter in the politics of building social pacts on social protection?: international experiences," Políticas Sociales 178, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    14. Goertz, Gary & Powers, Kathy, 2014. "Regional governance: The evolution of a new institutional form," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2014-106, Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:50:y:1996:i:02:p:325-347_02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Keith Waters). General contact details of provider: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_INO .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.