IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v44y1990i02p169-199_03.html

The international telecommunications regime: the political roots of regimes for high technology

Author

Listed:
  • Cowhey, Peter F.

Abstract

The international telecommunications regime provided a multilateral framework that reinforced domestic monopolies and bilateral cartel arrangements in the global market. The regime's epistemic community believed that telecommunications services and equipment were best supplied by national monopolies and that international communications by telephone, telegram, and telex should be jointly provided by monopolists. Strong domestic political incentives reinforced this cognitive framework. When technological innovation triggered a successful political attack on the domestic regulation of telecommunications in a few key countries, the stage was set for a global challenge to the intellectual and political foundations of the regime. Two paths to reform have emerged. Their significance can be assessed by looking at changes in the distribution of benefits from the regime, changes in the manner in which governments delegate power to the regime, and shifts in the epistemic community associated with the regime.

Suggested Citation

  • Cowhey, Peter F., 1990. "The international telecommunications regime: the political roots of regimes for high technology," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 169-199, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:44:y:1990:i:02:p:169-199_03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818300035244/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8527 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Derrick L. Cogburn, 2002. "Emergent Global Information Infrastructure/Global Information Society: Regime Formation and the Impact on Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2002-116, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Cornelia Woll, 2010. "Firm Interests in Uncertain Times: Business Lobbying in Multilateral Service Liberalization," Post-Print hal-00972803, HAL.
    4. ten Oever, Niels, 2023. "5G and the notion of network ideology, or: The limitations of sociotechnical imaginaries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5).
    5. Cornelia Woll, 2010. "Firm Interests in Uncertain Times: Business Lobbying in Multilateral Service Liberalization," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-00972803, HAL.
    6. Werle, Raymund, 2001. "Standards in the international telecommunications regime," HWWA Discussion Papers 157, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    7. Cowhey, Peter F. & Richards, John E., 2002. "Deregulating and liberalizing the North-American telecommunications market: Explaining the US-approach," HWWA Discussion Papers 164, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    8. Genschel, Philipp, 1995. "Standards in der Informationstechnik: Institutioneller Wandel in der internationalen Standardisierung," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 22, number 22.
    9. Genschel, Philipp, 1995. "The dynamics of inertia: Institutional persistence and institutional change in telecommunications and health care," MPIfG Discussion Paper 95/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    10. Peter Cowhey & Mikhail M. Klimenko, 2000. "Telecommunications reform in developing countries after the WTO agreement on basic telecommunications services," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(2), pages 265-281.
    11. Botzem, Sebastian & Hofmann, Jeanette, 2008. "Transnational institution building as public-private interaction: the case of standard setting on the Internet and in corporate financial reporting," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 36535, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Cornelia Woll, 2007. "From National Champions to Global Players? Lobbying by Dominant Providers during the WTO's Basic Telecom Negotiations," Post-Print hal-00972815, HAL.
    13. Genschel, Philipp & Werle, Raymund, 1992. "From National Hierarchies to International Standardization: Historical and Modal Changes in the Coordination of Telecommunications," MPIfG Discussion Paper 92/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    14. Cornelia Woll, 2007. "From National Champions to Global Players? Lobbying by Dominant Providers during the WTO's Basic Telecom Negotiations," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-00972815, HAL.
    15. Fuchs, Gerhard, 1993. "ISDN: The telecommunications highway for Europe after 1992 or Paving a dead end street?: The politics of pan-european telecommunications network development," MPIfG Discussion Paper 93/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    16. El-Moghazi, Mohamed & Whalley, Jason, 2019. "The International Radio Spectrum Management: A Regime Theory Analysis," 30th European Regional ITS Conference, Helsinki 2019 205176, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    17. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/f5vtl5h9a73d5ls976m3igpqi is not listed on IDEAS
    18. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/f5vtl5h9a73d5ls976m3igpqi is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Werle, Raymund & Leib, Volker, 1999. "The Internet society and its struggle for recognition and influence," MPIfG Working Paper 99/12, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    20. Levi-Faur, David, 1998. "The competition state as a neomercantilist state: Understanding the restructuring of national and global telecommunications," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 665-685.
    21. Werle, Raymund, 2001. "Standards in the International Telecommunications Regime," Discussion Paper Series 26265, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    22. Singh, J.P. & Flyverbom, Mikkel, 2016. "Representing participation in ICT4D projects," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 692-703.
    23. Hulsink, W., 1994. "The single European telecoms market : From state monopolies & national champions to an oligopoly of Euro-nationals and global alliances?," WORC Paper 94.04.030/3, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre.
    24. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8527 is not listed on IDEAS
    25. Cowhey, Peter F. & Richards, John E., 2002. "Deregulating and Liberalizing the North-American Telecommunications Market: Explaining the US-Approach," Discussion Paper Series 26378, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:44:y:1990:i:02:p:169-199_03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.