IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v3y1949i2p334-338_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Court of Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Anonymous

Abstract

On December 17, 1948, a Committee of Naval Experts was appointed by the International Court of Justice to report on eight technical points involved in the Corfu Channel case. Under the order of the Court the Committee, whose members were Commodore J. Bull of the Royal Norwegian Navy, Commodore S. A. Forshell of the Royal Swedish Navy and Lt. Commander S. J. W. Elfferich of the Royal Netherlands Navy, was to submit a report on the situation in the north Corfu strait at the time the incident took place, the type of mines involved, the possibility of laying mines without the knowledge of Albania, and the technical possibilities involved in testimony of a witness for the United Kingdom, former Lt. Commander Kovacic of the Yugoslav navy.

Suggested Citation

  • Anonymous, 1949. "International Court of Justice," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 334-338, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:3:y:1949:i:2:p:334-338_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818300020671/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Istrefi Remzije, 2017. "International Security Presence in Kosovo and its Human Rights Implications," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 23(80), pages 131-154, November.
    2. Alistair Rieu-Clarke, 2020. "The duty to take appropriate measures to prevent significant transboundary harm and private companies: insights from transboundary hydropower projects," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 667-682, December.
    3. Owen McIntyre, 2020. "The current state of development of the no significant harm principle: How far have we come?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 601-618, December.
    4. Carrillo-Santarelli Nicolás, 2018. "The Territory Paradox: the Basis of Statehood and International Norms as an Obstacle to the Protection of International Community Interests," Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Borys Kormych & Tetiana Averochkina & Vitalii Gaverskyi, 2020. "The public administration of territorial seas: Ukrainian case," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 577-595, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:3:y:1949:i:2:p:334-338_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.