IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v33y1979i04p525-539_03.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

U.S. black newspaper coverage of the UN and U.S. white coverage, 1948–1975

Author

Listed:
  • Petersen, Keith S.

Abstract

An analysis of UN coverage in sample years between 1948 and 1975 by five representative black U.S. newspapers as compared with the New York Times and, to a lesser extent, the Chicago Tribune shows that UN coverage by the black press since 1961 has declined, as it has for the white press, but that the decline in black press coverage is not only less sharp but has also been somewhat reversed in recent years. Patterns of coverage differ: greater priority is accorded in the black press to Africa and Asia and more emphasis is placed on personalities, especially on black Americans at the United Nations. Comparisons of black press coverage with UN “busyness†and with the differentials of support for the UN that have been manifested over the years in both black and white public opinion reveal no clear correlations.

Suggested Citation

  • Petersen, Keith S., 1979. "U.S. black newspaper coverage of the UN and U.S. white coverage, 1948–1975," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(4), pages 525-539, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:33:y:1979:i:04:p:525-539_03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002081830003229X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:33:y:1979:i:04:p:525-539_03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.