IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v33y1979i02p229-256_03.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negotiation as quasi–budgeting: the salmon catch negotiations between two world fishery powers

Author

Listed:
  • Inoguchi, Takashi
  • Miyatake, Nobuharu

Abstract

Suggested from the study of budgeting, the quasi-budgeting framework is used to analyze a certain type of negotiation. Three pre-conditions are spelled out for using this framework. A simple structural equation model to account for how negotiation outcomes are determined on the basis of the Soviet-Japanese salmon catch negotiations in the Northwest Pacific for the 1957–1977 period is presented. The estimation results for the 1957–1976 period as well as the predictive performance for the 1977 negotiations are demonstrated to be fairly good, thereby suggesting that the quasi-budgeting framework is both conceptually powerful and methodologically feasible in the study of various international negotiations.

Suggested Citation

  • Inoguchi, Takashi & Miyatake, Nobuharu, 1979. "Negotiation as quasi–budgeting: the salmon catch negotiations between two world fishery powers," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(2), pages 229-256, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:33:y:1979:i:02:p:229-256_03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002081830003215X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:33:y:1979:i:02:p:229-256_03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.