IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v9y2016i02p342-343_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eliminating a Quantitative Measure of Performance Means Our Science Is Starting From Square One

Author

Listed:
  • Burlacu, Gabriela

Abstract

In their debate about whether companies should keep traditional, numerical ratings of employee performance in an ever-changing world of work, Colquitt and colleagues argued that performance ratings are too hard to do correctly, while Adler and colleagues (Adler et al., 2016) countered that “‘too hard’ is no excuse for I-O psychology.†I would like to build on this by suggesting that “too hard†is not only no excuse but also a complete dismissal of the central aspect of what our science seeks to achieve.

Suggested Citation

  • Burlacu, Gabriela, 2016. "Eliminating a Quantitative Measure of Performance Means Our Science Is Starting From Square One," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 342-343, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:9:y:2016:i:02:p:342-343_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942616000225/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:9:y:2016:i:02:p:342-343_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.