IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v19y2026i3p_13.html

Leveraging the science and practice of industrial and organizational psychology for effective circular economy implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Schilling, Hannes
  • Ritter, Marie
  • Kühner, Clara
  • Hirschberger, Stephanie
  • Zacher, Hannes
  • Kauffeld, Simone

Abstract

Instead of following an “end-of-life” concept, the circular economy focuses on reducing, or alternatively reusing, recycling, and recovering materials in production, distribution, and consumption processes. Despite its potential to contribute to organizational environmental sustainability goals, there is much uncertainty about how the circular economy can be effectively implemented. So far, industrial and organizational (I-O) psychological science and practice have largely neglected how factors such as employee attitudes and motivation, teamwork, leadership behavior, and work design may contribute to the implementation of circular economy practices. Accordingly, the aim of this focal article is to outline how expertise from I-O psychology could be used for effective circular economy implementation. To achieve this goal, we first briefly summarize the history and current practices of the circular economy. Second, we expand the current understanding of the circular economy by adding an I-O psychology perspective. Third, we link the circular economy to other relevant topics in I-O psychology, such as corporate social responsibility and employee green behavior. Finally, we outline how I-O psychologists could address one of the major challenges in the circular economy transformation: intra- and interorganizational cooperation within and across the circular value chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Schilling, Hannes & Ritter, Marie & Kühner, Clara & Hirschberger, Stephanie & Zacher, Hannes & Kauffeld, Simone, 2026. "Leveraging the science and practice of industrial and organizational psychology for effective circular economy implementation," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(3), pages -13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:19:y:2026:i:3:p:_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942626100716/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:19:y:2026:i:3:p:_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.