IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v18y2025i3p378-386_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Academic freedom under siege: How state legislatures are reshaping higher education

Author

Listed:
  • Keith, Melissa G.
  • Zickar, Michael J.

Abstract

The recent wave of executive orders and other actions at the federal level has received a great deal of attention in recent months. Receiving relatively less attention, however, has been ongoing efforts at the state level over the past couple of years to exercise more control over higher education. The present brief reviews recent state legislation impacting higher education with a particular focus on the recently enacted Ohio Senate Bill 1, as an illustrative example. We suggest that these state legislative efforts pose a threat to academic freedom through attacks on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), curricular control, tenure, and faculty unionization. We provide an overview of these state legislative efforts and implications for I-O psychologists, particularly those in academia.

Suggested Citation

  • Keith, Melissa G. & Zickar, Michael J., 2025. "Academic freedom under siege: How state legislatures are reshaping higher education," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 378-386, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:378-386_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942625100242/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:378-386_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.