IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v18y2025i2p236-253_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing engagement in workplace belonging efforts: Why moral processes matter

Author

Listed:
  • Maneethai, Dustin
  • Johnson, Lars U.
  • Atwater, Leanne A.
  • Witt, L. A.

Abstract

Organizations and managers often implement workplace training programs aimed at fostering collaboration, belonging, and respect among employees. However, the effectiveness of these programs can be undermined when they are framed in ways that only resonate with some participants while alienating others. We propose that moral reframing can enhance the success of such initiatives by aligning messaging with a broader range of moral perspectives. Drawing on moral foundations theory, we identify five key dimensions, care, fairness, loyalty, authority, and purity, that shape how individuals interpret and respond to workplace training efforts. Although many programs emphasize care and fairness, individuals who prioritize loyalty, authority, and purity may perceive them differently, leading to disengagement, skepticism, or resistance. We argue that strategically framing training initiatives across multiple moral frameworks can foster greater engagement, buy-in, and overall effectiveness. Additionally, we offer practical recommendations for organizations to implement moral reframing strategies, ensuring that training efforts resonate with a wider audience and contribute to a more cohesive and productive workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Maneethai, Dustin & Johnson, Lars U. & Atwater, Leanne A. & Witt, L. A., 2025. "Enhancing engagement in workplace belonging efforts: Why moral processes matter," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 236-253, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:236-253_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942624000609/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:236-253_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.