IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v16y2023i4p541-546_21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employee response to employer-sponsored direct primary care

Author

Listed:
  • Gage, Stephen
  • Hakim, Amy Cooper

Abstract

Health benefits represent employers’ fastest growing operating expense. Efforts from human resources to control healthcare spending through restrictive plan design changes and corporate wellness programs may not achieve employer health and financial goals and may negatively impact employee outcomes. Employers are increasingly contracting directly with providers in order to access quality medical care and to control spending. The purpose of this practice-focused paper is to provide survey data collected from 10 employers as part of the quality improvement activities of a direct primary care (DPC) program. Overall, survey responses of employees engaged with DPC had higher patient satisfaction, group health plan rating, perceived organizational support, and job satisfaction than survey responses of those registered into the program but not yet engaged with a DPC physician. Implementation considerations and DPC characteristics are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Gage, Stephen & Hakim, Amy Cooper, 2023. "Employee response to employer-sponsored direct primary care," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 541-546, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:541-546_21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S175494262300069X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:541-546_21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.