IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v16y2023i1p1-19_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neurodiversity in the workplace: Considering neuroatypicality as a form of diversity

Author

Listed:
  • LeFevre-Levy, Rose
  • Melson-Silimon, Arturia
  • Harmata, Rebecca
  • Hulett, Anna L.
  • Carter, Nathan T.

Abstract

Estimates suggest as much as 17% of the US workforce may be neuroatypical, a term used to describe individuals whose neurological functioning is at the tail ends of the distribution of naturally occurring variation. Although the neuroatypical population has a history of under- and unemployment, their inclusion in the modern workplace (i.e., promotion of neurodiversity within organizations) is gaining recognition by scholars and organizations as an important dimension of organizational diversity. Despite this burgeoning interest in examining neuroatypicality in the context of organizational diversity, surprisingly little research has been conducted that bridges these two research areas. The literature that does exist is scattered across several different academic disciplines, largely outside of industrial-organizational psychology, and rarely examines the employment of neuroatypical workers explicitly from a diversity perspective. In this article we argue that as the nature of work evolves and jobs continue to become more specialized, neurodiversity will become an increasingly relevant dimension of organizational diversity and is likely to play a key role both in terms of individual employees’ well-being and performance outcomes, as well as organizational success.

Suggested Citation

  • LeFevre-Levy, Rose & Melson-Silimon, Arturia & Harmata, Rebecca & Hulett, Anna L. & Carter, Nathan T., 2023. "Neurodiversity in the workplace: Considering neuroatypicality as a form of diversity," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:1-19_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942622000864/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:1-19_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.