IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v15y2022i4p554-577_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reckoning with racialized police violence: The role of I-O psychology

Author

Listed:
  • Dhanani, Lindsay Y.
  • Wiese, Christopher W.
  • Brooks, LeVonte’
  • Beckles, Kyana

Abstract

The country has been gripped by the events that have unfolded in the wake of the police killings of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor. In response to these new examples of long-standing police violence, there have been calls to substantially reimage policing to reduce the number of violent incidents that occur between officers and the public and to combat officers’ disproportionate use of force with Black Americans. In this article, we call on industrial-organizational (I-O) psychologists to leverage their expertise to help actuate meaningful change within law enforcement. To help guide our collective efforts as a field, we provide a review of the current state of affairs as they relate to recruitment, selection, training, performance management, occupational stress, and organizational culture in law enforcement and then offer recommendations for ways to change current practices to encourage more equitable and responsible policing. We also highlight areas in which further investigation is needed and urge I-O psychologists to invest in building the knowledge necessary to inform future practices. We hope this article can facilitate a discussion about how our field can contribute to achieving evidence-based and lasting change that benefits officers and the members of the communities they serve.

Suggested Citation

  • Dhanani, Lindsay Y. & Wiese, Christopher W. & Brooks, LeVonte’ & Beckles, Kyana, 2022. "Reckoning with racialized police violence: The role of I-O psychology," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 554-577, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:554-577_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942622000621/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:554-577_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.