IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v12y2019i4p429-443_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work: What is it good for? (Absolutely nothing)—a critical theorist’s perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Mumby, Dennis K.

Abstract

The title of this focal article (unashamedly paraphrased from Edwin Starr’s classic 1970 antiwar song) is only partly intended to be tongue in cheek; work is a strange thing with a very checkered history. For the most part, it is something we take for granted. Most able-bodied adults work. Working hard is taken as a sign of being an upstanding citizen. Right wing politicians even insist that “government handouts†only be made available in exchange for participation in “workfare†programs. Moreover, work is not just something we do; over the last 100 years or so, it has become a defining, constitutive feature of who we are as human beings. Our very sense of identity and well-being is tied up with our relationship to work. It is no accident, after all, that the first question we ask a stranger is, “What do you do?†(and we are not asking about their hobbies); we see this question as a way of taking the measure of that person.

Suggested Citation

  • Mumby, Dennis K., 2019. "Work: What is it good for? (Absolutely nothing)—a critical theorist’s perspective," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(4), pages 429-443, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:12:y:2019:i:4:p:429-443_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942619000695/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:12:y:2019:i:4:p:429-443_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.