IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v11y2018i03p482-486_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SET: Still a Relevant Theory for the Future of Work

Author

Listed:
  • Kurtessis, James N.
  • Northon, Lindsay
  • Streets, Valerie N.

Abstract

Few would argue that the workplace has changed tremendously over a short period of time and will continue to evolve in the years to come. Regardless of whether change is major or minor, lightning fast or painfully slow, change in and of itself may not be sufficient cause for substantial revision of existing theories, such as social exchange theory (SET); the formulation of entirely new theories; or the creation of new constructs. This is for two reasons: (a) the possibility that we overestimate the impact of change on the workplace, and (b) change can be readily incorporated into our existing theories. We expand on each of these points below and describe several possible macrolevel trends that may impact SET in the years to come.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurtessis, James N. & Northon, Lindsay & Streets, Valerie N., 2018. "SET: Still a Relevant Theory for the Future of Work," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 482-486, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:11:y:2018:i:03:p:482-486_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942618000998/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:11:y:2018:i:03:p:482-486_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.