IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v10y2017i04p606-610_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Authors Speak: Six I-O Psychology Textbook Authors Discuss How They Decide What to Cite

Author

Listed:
  • Aamodt, Michael G.
  • Conte, Jeffrey M.
  • Howes, Satoris S.
  • Levy, Paul E.
  • Riggio, Ronald E.
  • Spector, Paul E.

Abstract

In their focal article, Aguinis et al. (2017) provided a bibliometric analysis of our six industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology textbooks, noting among other things the sources, articles, and authors we collectively cited the most. Their analysis provides information about what we cited but not why. In this commentary on their article, our goal is to provide some insights into our process in deciding what sources to include and what not to include in our textbooks. Although each of us has our own way of deciding on the content of our books, there is enough commonality that we decided to write this commentary together.

Suggested Citation

  • Aamodt, Michael G. & Conte, Jeffrey M. & Howes, Satoris S. & Levy, Paul E. & Riggio, Ronald E. & Spector, Paul E., 2017. "The Authors Speak: Six I-O Psychology Textbook Authors Discuss How They Decide What to Cite," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(4), pages 606-610, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:10:y:2017:i:04:p:606-610_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942617000645/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:10:y:2017:i:04:p:606-610_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.