A Missing Link in Gloss et al. (“From Handmaidens to POSH Humanitarians†)

Among many salient shifts in international development research over the last few decades has been growing legitimacy in recognition/documentation of the “rise of the South†as noted in the UNDP Human Development Report (2013). This has redirected both research and practice beyond just Northern (read “Western†) approaches, opened up new resource flows for “Southern†institutions, and initiated a whole new set of initiatives around “South–South†cooperation (Malik, 2014). To Mahbub ul Haq's original theme of “enlarging people's choices†were added new dimensions of looking beyond just western economies (and solely “economistic†analysis and prescriptions) for solutions to existential threats to sustainable development among the world's poorer nations (UNDP, 1990, p. 9). Fundamental shifts such as these, epitomized in Mahbub's well-known statement on human capacity, provide the basis for the focal article by Gloss, Carr, Reichman, Abdul-Nasiru, and Oestereich (2017) that builds skillfully on a framework, which of course also calls on Amartya Sen's work (so closely aligned with and influential in the Human Development Report series). The result is an original, carefully argued, and, perhaps some will agree, long overdue article synching the broad discipline of modern industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology into a more realistic awareness of how the majority of the world's populations sustain their livelihoods. However, there is a crucial “space†that I-O psychology seems to be still missing, and one barely touched on by this article, and that is the macropolicy environment that brings institutions in government and civil society together in more strategic approaches to developing human “resourcefulness.â€