IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v5y2010i01p53-70_99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does competition among general practitioners increase or decrease the consumption of specialist health care?

Author

Listed:
  • Tjerbo, Trond

Abstract

Studies of the effects of capacity and competition among general practitioners (GPs) on the use of specialist health care services are inconclusive. Some studies indicate that an increase in the number of GPs leads to increased consumption of specialist health care, while other studies point in the opposite direction. This article adds to the literature in two ways; first by testing out different operationalization of capacity and competition among GPs, and then by testing out effects of capacity and competition on use of specialist health care services as this is disaggregated into ambulatory and inpatient activities. The empirical tests indicate that GP capacity in itself does not affect use of specialist health care services. Increased competitions among GPs do, however, reduce the use of ambulatory care while the effects on the use of inpatient services are unaffected.

Suggested Citation

  • Tjerbo, Trond, 2010. "Does competition among general practitioners increase or decrease the consumption of specialist health care?," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 53-70, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:5:y:2010:i:01:p:53-70_99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744133109990156/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martinussen, Pål E., 2013. "Hospital physicians’ assessments of their interaction with GPs: The role of physician and community characteristics," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 14-21.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:5:y:2010:i:01:p:53-70_99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.