IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v11y1995i01p81-104_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Test for Nonstationarity Against the Stable Alternative

Author

Listed:
  • Abadir, Karim M.

Abstract

It was recently shown (Abadir, 1993b) that nonstationarity causes the limiting distributions of the Wald (W) and Lagrange multiplier (LM) statistics to become different from each other. This paper demonstrates that such a divergence between the two distributions can be used as an indicator of the presence of a unit root. A test based on this idea is devised by modifying the normalized autocorrelation coefficient (NAC). It is then shown to be an improvement on NAC in large samples and an improvement on other existing tests in large effective samples. The paper also investigates the effect of nonstationarity on the well-known inequality W ≥ LR ≥ LM.

Suggested Citation

  • Abadir, Karim M., 1995. "A New Test for Nonstationarity Against the Stable Alternative," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 81-104, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:11:y:1995:i:01:p:81-104_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S026646660000904X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abadir, Karim M., 1995. "Unbiased estimation as a solution to testing for random walks," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(3-4), pages 263-268, March.
    2. Horowitz, Joel L. & Savin, N. E., 2000. "Empirically relevant critical values for hypothesis tests: A bootstrap approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 375-389, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:11:y:1995:i:01:p:81-104_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.