IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/endeec/v27y2022i6p578-600_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using choice modelling to identify popular and affordable alternative interventions for schistosomiasis in Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Meginnis, Keila
  • Hanley, Nick
  • Mujumbusi, Lazaaro
  • Pickering, Lucy
  • Lamberton, Poppy H. L.

Abstract

Schistosomiasis is caused by a vector-borne parasite, commonly found in low- and middle-income countries. People become infected by direct contact with contaminated water through activities such as collecting water, bathing and fishing. Water becomes contaminated when human waste is not adequately contained. We administered a discrete choice experiment to understand community preferences for interventions that would reduce individuals' risk of contracting, or transmitting, Schistosoma mansoni. These focused on water access, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions. We compared interventions that target behaviours that mainly put oneself at higher risk versus behaviours that mainly put others at risk. We used two payment vehicles to quantify what individuals are willing to give up in time and/or labour for interventions to be implemented. Key findings indicate that new sources of potable water and fines on open defecation are the highest valued interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Meginnis, Keila & Hanley, Nick & Mujumbusi, Lazaaro & Pickering, Lucy & Lamberton, Poppy H. L., 2022. "Using choice modelling to identify popular and affordable alternative interventions for schistosomiasis in Uganda," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(6), pages 578-600, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:27:y:2022:i:6:p:578-600_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1355770X22000079/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:27:y:2022:i:6:p:578-600_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ede .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.