IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buspol/v28y2026i2p284-318_6.html

Trade lobbying works (for big firms): Evidence from the China trade war

Author

Listed:
  • Eldes, Ayse
  • Lee, Jieun
  • Osgood, Iain

Abstract

Is trade lobbying effective and does its effectiveness vary across firms? Using requests for relief from China trade war tariffs, we demonstrate that lobbying for specific trade policies contributed to securing those exact policies, an elusive target in the long-running trade lobbying literature. We further argue that lobbying should be most impactful for big companies because policymakers prioritize jobs and growth when allocating a limited number of policy favors. In line with this, we find that lobbying for tariff reductions by large firms was hugely more effective than for small firms, though with one major exception: requests from firms that owned foreign subsidiaries in China were overwhelmingly rejected. Large firms are powerful, especially when their interests align with policymakers’ economic policy objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Eldes, Ayse & Lee, Jieun & Osgood, Iain, 2026. "Trade lobbying works (for big firms): Evidence from the China trade war," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 284-318, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buspol:v:28:y:2026:i:2:p:284-318_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1469356925000138/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buspol:v:28:y:2026:i:2:p:284-318_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.