IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buspol/v26y2024i4p598-620_8.html

Class inequality, power, and trust in private companies: evidence from Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Pérez-Ahumada, Pablo
  • Gutiérrez-Crocco, Francisca
  • Astorga-Pinto, Charo

Abstract

In the last few years, legitimacy has proven to be a fundamental power resource for the business class. Building on the idea of “discursive power,” investigations have demonstrated that when the business class successfully shapes public discourses and public opinion, its power increases. With this article, we contribute to this research by showing that businesses’ success in building discursive power, as expressed in individual trust in private companies, is limited by individual- and macro-level factors associated with class inequality, class politics, and power. Using data from 15 Latin American countries (2005–2015), we show that in the period studied, the propensity to trust private companies was significantly lower among those in underprivileged class positions (e.g., working-class people or the informal self-employed) and among those who identify with the political left and have less confidence in political institutions. At the macro level, trust in companies was lower in countries ruled by the left or in countries where inequality rose or where citizens’ trust in political institutions improved. At the end of this article, we identify three patterns of business legitimacy in Latin America and show how our results contribute to the recent research on trust, class, and power.

Suggested Citation

  • Pérez-Ahumada, Pablo & Gutiérrez-Crocco, Francisca & Astorga-Pinto, Charo, 2024. "Class inequality, power, and trust in private companies: evidence from Latin America," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(4), pages 598-620, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buspol:v:26:y:2024:i:4:p:598-620_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S146935692400017X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buspol:v:26:y:2024:i:4:p:598-620_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.