IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buspol/v25y2023i1p53-66_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The perceptional triangle of incivility, politics, and democracy: The role of supportiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed, Kaleem
  • Ahmed, Alia
  • Adeel, Shahzada

Abstract

Bringing democracy to the workplace has gained researchers’ attention during the last few years. In addition to its proorganizational outcomes, democratization at the workplace also helps to eradicate organizational negativities. The present study investigates these claims by empirically examining the relationship between organizational democracy, perception of politics, and workplace incivility. A sample of 300 full-time employees working in fifteen different banks in the district of Gujrat Pakistan was obtained. The structural equation modeling technique was used to test the proposed hypotheses. The results indicated that workplace democracy is negatively associated with the perception of organizational politics and workplace incivility. Nevertheless, when there is organizational democracy with a supportive environment, it further reduces its incivility and politics. The study provides empirical evidence to managers and organizational decision makers in developing democratic workplaces to promote participative culture and eradicate organizational negativities. More studies on democratic practices with different contexts and factors are discussed and proposed for future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed, Kaleem & Ahmed, Alia & Adeel, Shahzada, 2023. "The perceptional triangle of incivility, politics, and democracy: The role of supportiveness," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 53-66, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buspol:v:25:y:2023:i:1:p:53-66_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1469356922000258/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buspol:v:25:y:2023:i:1:p:53-66_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.