IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhurj/v2y2017i01p31-53_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empty Promises and the Myth of Mining: Does Mining Lead to Pro-Poor Development?

Author

Listed:
  • MEYERSFELD, Bonita

Abstract

Mining operations in the Global South often worsen conditions for affected communities after the conclusion of the operations as compared to pre-mining conditions. This is regression, not progress, which is contrary to the narrative surrounding mining’s promise of economic growth. While mining certainly brings profit, this profit does not result in social and economic development of affected communities and people living in poverty. This is the ‘myth of mining’ and the objective of this article is to expose this myth, identify its failings and propose a notion of ‘equitable mining’ that could ensure a pro-poor mining industry.

Suggested Citation

  • MEYERSFELD, Bonita, 2017. "Empty Promises and the Myth of Mining: Does Mining Lead to Pro-Poor Development?," Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 31-53, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhurj:v:2:y:2017:i:01:p:31-53_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2057019816000250/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhurj:v:2:y:2017:i:01:p:31-53_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.