IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v32y2022i4p519-545_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Ethics of Employment-at-Will: An Institutional Complementarities Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Bhargava, Vikram R.
  • Young, Carson

Abstract

Employment-at-will (EAW) is the legal presumption that employers and employees may terminate an employment relationship for any or no reason. Defenders of EAW have argued that it promotes autonomy and efficiency. Critics have argued that it allows for the domination, subordination, and arbitrary treatment of employees. We intervene in this debate by arguing that the case for EAW is contextual in a way that existing business ethics scholarship has not considered. In particular, we argue that the justifiability of EAW for a given jurisdiction depends on existing complementarities among the institutions that constitute the jurisdiction’s political economy. Notably, our view takes seriously the ethical concerns EAW critics have raised by showing how these concerns can be mitigated through public policy measures that do not require eliminating EAW.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhargava, Vikram R. & Young, Carson, 2022. "The Ethics of Employment-at-Will: An Institutional Complementarities Approach," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(4), pages 519-545, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:32:y:2022:i:4:p:519-545_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X21000403/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlo Ludovico Cordasco & Nick Cowen, 2024. "Market Participation, Self-respect, and Risk Tolerance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(3), pages 591-602, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:32:y:2022:i:4:p:519-545_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.