IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v24y2014i02p203-227_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decent Termination: A Moral Case for Severance Pay

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Tae Wan

Abstract

People are often involuntarily laid off from their jobs through no fault of their own. Employees who are dismissed in this manner cannot always legitimately hold employers accountable for these miserable situations because the decision to implement layoffs is often the best possible outcome given the context—that is, layoffs in and of themselves may be “necessary evils.†Yet, even in circumstances in which layoffs qualify as “necessary evils,†morality demands that employers respect the dignity of those whose employment is involuntarily terminated. In this paper I argue that to preserve the dignity of employees who are involuntarily terminated, in most cases employers have a substantial reason to offer a special kind of unemployment benefit, “severance pay.†To support my claim I draw and expand upon Bernard Williams’s analysis of “agent-regret,†which I believe greatly helps to address and articulate employers’ obligations in the context of involuntary termination.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Tae Wan, 2014. "Decent Termination: A Moral Case for Severance Pay," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 203-227, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:24:y:2014:i:02:p:203-227_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00005984/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. DragoS BIGU & Ionut ANASTASIU, 2017. "Layoffs And Employee Discipline: Business Ethics Issues," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 981-986, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:24:y:2014:i:02:p:203-227_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.