IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v56y2026ipe61_60.html

Who’s Asking Whom? Gendering in Parliamentary Interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Kostovicova, Denisa
  • Sinmazdemir, Tolga
  • La Lova, Lanabi
  • Popovski, Vesna

Abstract

Male domination is asserted and reproduced through speaking behavior in parliaments. We address the enduring challenge of women’s marginalization by examining the interactive nature of speech. People adjust their speaking behavior based on the gender and status of those with whom they interact. Analyzing over 2,500 question-and-answer sequences in the Croatian Parliament (2004–20), we identify interactional asymmetry: male MPs ask fewer and shorter questions of female ministers than of male ministers, and engage in shorter exchanges with women than with men. Notably, female MPs partially replicate this pattern, posing shorter questions to female ministers. Female ministers, however, use their executive status to assert authority and respond with longer answers than men, despite their marginalization as women. We reveal how non-cooperation through withholding speech and limiting engagement with women operates as a form of power in interactions, reproducing parliaments as masculine institutions whilst affecting the quality of government oversight.

Suggested Citation

  • Kostovicova, Denisa & Sinmazdemir, Tolga & La Lova, Lanabi & Popovski, Vesna, 2026. "Who’s Asking Whom? Gendering in Parliamentary Interactions," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56, pages 1-61, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:56:y:2026:i::p:e61_60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000712342610177X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:56:y:2026:i::p:e61_60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.