IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v56y2026ipe45_45.html

Can Authoritarian Electoral Propaganda Compete with the Opposition? Experimental Evidence from Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Rochlitz, Michael
  • Schoors, Koen
  • Zakharov, Nikita

Abstract

We examine the effectiveness of electoral propaganda in an autocracy, using Russia as a unique setting. Exploiting the unexpected release of a pro-regime propaganda video about Vladimir Putin shortly before the presidential election, we conducted a field experiment by randomly promoting the video to voters via a telephone survey and measuring self-reported voting behaviour after the election. Our results show that the pro-regime treatment successfully mobilized offline media consumers to vote for Putin, but failed to persuade online media users, and even backfired among respondents dissatisfied with the regime. Using electoral statistics for all major Russian cities and instrumenting public interest in the propaganda video with rainfall, we find a positive, albeit moderate, causal effect of the video on Putin’s vote share. As an alternative treatment, we used a viral anti-corruption video by opposition leader Alexei Navalny, which consistently undermined regime support among both offline and online media consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Rochlitz, Michael & Schoors, Koen & Zakharov, Nikita, 2026. "Can Authoritarian Electoral Propaganda Compete with the Opposition? Experimental Evidence from Russia," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56, pages 1-45, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:56:y:2026:i::p:e45_45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123426101604/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:56:y:2026:i::p:e45_45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.