IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v56y2026ip-_25.html

Elite Misperceptions in Foreign Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Kertzer, Joshua D.
  • Busby, Joshua
  • Monten, Jonathan
  • Tama, Jordan
  • Kafura, Craig

Abstract

Many models of domestic politics in international relations presume that political elites correctly perceive public preferences, even as a growing body of research in political behavior calls this assumption into question. Leveraging seven paired surveys of 4,852 foreign policy elites and 13,687 members of the American public from 2004–24 on twenty-four different questions, we show elites systematically misperceive public opinion in foreign policy, misperceiving the public as more isolationist and inward-looking than it actually is. We replicate this finding with a paired experiment showing that elites effectively underestimate the public’s responsiveness to cues from international organizations, and that elites with isolationist stereotypes underestimate public approval the most. These dynamics – which operate predominantly through stereotyping, rather than projection – have important implications for the study of political elites, public opinion about foreign policy, and efforts to test theoretical models of domestic politics in international relations using public opinion data alone.

Suggested Citation

  • Kertzer, Joshua D. & Busby, Joshua & Monten, Jonathan & Tama, Jordan & Kafura, Craig, 2026. "Elite Misperceptions in Foreign Policy," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:56:y:2026:i::p:-_25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123426101495/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:56:y:2026:i::p:-_25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.