IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v55y2025ip-_177.html

Race, Gender, and Nascent Political Ambition

Author

Listed:
  • Junqueira, Andrea
  • O’Brien, Diana Z.
  • Hayes, Matthew
  • Jeong, Jongwoo
  • Crisp, Brian
  • Gabel, Matthew

Abstract

How do race and gender together shape Americans’ political ambition? Using original survey data with over-samples of black and Hispanic respondents, we analyze citizens’ nascent ambition for eight political offices across racial/ethnic groups and gender. We reveal that the primary gap in nascent political ambition is not between men and women but between white men and the majority of the polity. There is no consistent gender gap in ambition among black or Hispanic respondents, nor between black and Hispanic men and white women. The gap between white men and other respondents is most pronounced for local offices, which mark both the starting point and final stage of many political careers. Our findings further indicate that while white men are particularly responsive to encouragement from non-political sources, ambition gaps narrow among respondents encouraged by political actors. Together, these insights help explain the persistence of white men’s overrepresentation in US politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Junqueira, Andrea & O’Brien, Diana Z. & Hayes, Matthew & Jeong, Jongwoo & Crisp, Brian & Gabel, Matthew, 2025. "Race, Gender, and Nascent Political Ambition," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:55:y:2025:i::p:-_177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123425000432/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:55:y:2025:i::p:-_177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.