IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v55y2025ip-_169.html

Decisive or Distracted: The Effects of US Constraint on Security Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Choi, Ha Eun
  • de Marchi, Scott
  • Gallop, Max
  • Minhas, Shahryar

Abstract

The rise of China as a global power has been a prominent feature in international politics. Simultaneously, the United States has been engaged in ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and South Asia for the past two decades, requiring a significant commitment of resources, focus, and determination. This paper investigates how third-party countries react to the United States’ preoccupation with these conflicts, particularly in terms of diplomatic co-operation and alignment. We introduce a measure of US distraction and utilize network-based indicators to assess diplomatic co-operation or alignment. Our study tests the hypothesis that when the US is distracted, other states are more likely to co-operate with its principal rival, China. Our findings support this hypothesis, revealing that increased co-operation with China is more probable during periods of US distraction. However, a closer examination of state responses shows that democracies distance themselves from China under these circumstances, while non-democracies move closer.

Suggested Citation

  • Choi, Ha Eun & de Marchi, Scott & Gallop, Max & Minhas, Shahryar, 2025. "Decisive or Distracted: The Effects of US Constraint on Security Networks," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:55:y:2025:i::p:-_169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123425101026/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:55:y:2025:i::p:-_169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.