IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v55y2025ip-_134.html

Contentious Rituals and Intergroup Relations: Parading in Northern Ireland

Author

Listed:
  • Rickard, Kit
  • Hollenweger, Giovanni
  • Weber, Sigrid
  • Bakke, Kristin M.

Abstract

In some divided societies, identity-based groups engage in ‘contentious rituals’, such as public parades or commemorative events, to cultivate the group’s collective social memory and build solidarity. We examine whether and how such rituals perpetuate group divisions in post-conflict societies, drawing on evidence from a case study of parading in Northern Ireland. Every year, contentious parades in this post-conflict society have the potential to raise tensions between the two major communities, Catholics and Protestants. Using a mixed-methods design, we show that parades in Northern Ireland are detrimental to intergroup attitudes. Our research design relies on compiling geolocated data on over 55,000 parades (2002–22), analyses of both nationally representative longitudinal surveys (2003–19) and an original survey fielded in 2022, and insights from qualitative fieldwork conducted during the height of the parading season in 2023.

Suggested Citation

  • Rickard, Kit & Hollenweger, Giovanni & Weber, Sigrid & Bakke, Kristin M., 2025. "Contentious Rituals and Intergroup Relations: Parading in Northern Ireland," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:55:y:2025:i::p:-_134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123425100835/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:55:y:2025:i::p:-_134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.