IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v54y2024i2p295-312_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Support for Deliberative mini-Publics among the Losers of Representative Democracy

Author

Listed:
  • Pilet, Jean-Benoit
  • Bedock, Camille
  • Talukder, David
  • Rangoni, Sacha

Abstract

The literature on deliberative mini-publics (DMPs) establishes a link between political dissatisfaction and support for DMPs. However, little is known about the sources of political dissatisfaction that trigger this support. Our research tackles this specific question and claims that citizen dissatisfaction is rooted in a position of ‘losers of representative democracy’, which leads citizens to be more open to reforms that move away from the representative model. Building on the literature on loser's consent, we focus on the effect of voting for a party not associated with the government and of descriptive and substantive (under)-representation in support of DMPs. We rely on a comparative survey conducted across fifteen Western European countries. Supporters of opposition parties and those who are badly represented, both descriptively and substantively, are more supportive of DMPs. These findings have important implications for understanding the public appeal for deliberative democracy instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Pilet, Jean-Benoit & Bedock, Camille & Talukder, David & Rangoni, Sacha, 2024. "Support for Deliberative mini-Publics among the Losers of Representative Democracy," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(2), pages 295-312, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:2:p:295-312_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123423000479/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:2:p:295-312_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.