IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v54y2024i1p88-109_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Local Factions Pressure Parties: Activist Groups and Primary Contests in the Tea Party Era

Author

Listed:
  • Blum, Rachel M.
  • Cowburn, Mike

Abstract

The contemporary Republican Party has been the site of asymmetric partisan entrenchment and factional infighting. We test whether factional pressure from a far-right faction (the Tea Party) exacerbated the party's rightward movement with a granular analysis of Republican factionalism at the congressional district level. We develop a measure of local factionalism using novel datasets of activist presence and primary contests. Then, we conduct a difference-in-differences analysis to assess whether local factionalism in the Tea Party era heightened Republican partisanship and legislative extremism at the district level. We find that districts that experienced factional pressure moved rightward on both measures. These findings help clarify how the Tea Party captured the Republican Party and support a focus on the role of party factions in fomenting partisan conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Blum, Rachel M. & Cowburn, Mike, 2024. "How Local Factions Pressure Parties: Activist Groups and Primary Contests in the Tea Party Era," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(1), pages 88-109, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:1:p:88-109_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123423000224/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:1:p:88-109_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.