IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v54y2024i1p179-200_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Super-Unsupervised’ Classification for Labelling Text: Online Political Hostility as an Illustration

Author

Listed:
  • Hebbelstrup Rye Rasmussen, Stig
  • Bor, Alexander
  • Osmundsen, Mathias
  • Petersen, Michael Bang

Abstract

We live in a world of text. Yet the sheer magnitude of social media data, coupled with a need to measure complex psychological constructs, has made this important source of data difficult to use. Researchers often engage in costly hand coding of thousands of texts using supervised techniques or rely on unsupervised techniques where the measurement of predefined constructs is difficult. We propose a novel approach that we call ‘super-unsupervised’ learning and demonstrate its usefulness by measuring the psychologically complex construct of online political hostility based on a large corpus of tweets. This approach accomplishes the feat by combining the best features of supervised and unsupervised learning techniques: measurements of complex psychological constructs without a single labelled data source. We first outline the approach before conducting a diverse series of tests that include: (i) face validity, (ii) convergent and discriminant validity, (iii) criterion validity, (iv) external validity, and (v) ecological validity.

Suggested Citation

  • Hebbelstrup Rye Rasmussen, Stig & Bor, Alexander & Osmundsen, Mathias & Petersen, Michael Bang, 2024. "‘Super-Unsupervised’ Classification for Labelling Text: Online Political Hostility as an Illustration," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(1), pages 179-200, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:1:p:179-200_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123423000042/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:1:p:179-200_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.