IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v53y2023i4p1132-1149_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Animosity, Amnesia, or Admiration? Mass Opinion Around the World Toward the Former Colonizer

Author

Listed:
  • Baker, Andy
  • Cupery, David

Abstract

Nearly all contemporary countries were colonized at some point in their history by a foreign power, but do citizens resent their former metropoles for past colonial abuses? We exploit survey questions in which respondents were asked for their opinion of a named foreign country. Our analyses of responses from over ninety countries yield the surprising finding that today's citizens are more favourable toward their country's former colonizer – by 40 per cent of a standard deviation – than they are toward other countries. Contemporary monadic traits that make former metropoles liked around the world – especially their tendency to be democracies – as well as their relatively high volumes of trade with former colonies explain their popularity among citizens of their former colonies. We also illustrate and describe these patterns in two least-likely cases, Mexico and Zimbabwe. Our findings have important implications for understanding international soft power, an asset about which today's states care deeply.

Suggested Citation

  • Baker, Andy & Cupery, David, 2023. "Animosity, Amnesia, or Admiration? Mass Opinion Around the World Toward the Former Colonizer," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(4), pages 1132-1149, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:53:y:2023:i:4:p:1132-1149_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123422000710/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:53:y:2023:i:4:p:1132-1149_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.