IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v53y2023i3p997-1015_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Dislikes Whom? Affective Polarization between Pairs of Parties in Western Democracies

Author

Listed:
  • Gidron, Noam
  • Adams, James
  • Horne, Will

Abstract

While dislike of opposing parties, that is, affective polarization, is a defining feature of contemporary politics, research on this topic largely centers on the United States. We introduce an approach that analyzes affective polarization between pairs of parties, bridging the US two-party system and multiparty systems in other democracies. Analyzing survey data from twenty Western democracies since the mid-1990s, first, we show that partisans' dislike of out-parties is linked to elite policy disagreements on economic issues and, increasingly over time, also to cultural issues. Secondly, we argue and empirically demonstrate that governing coalition partners in parliamentary democracies display much warmer feelings toward each other than we would expect based on elite policy (dis)agreements. Third, we show that radical right parties are disliked much more intensely than we would expect based on policy disputes and coalition arrangements. These findings highlight the policy-based and institutional underpinnings of affective polarization.

Suggested Citation

  • Gidron, Noam & Adams, James & Horne, Will, 2023. "Who Dislikes Whom? Affective Polarization between Pairs of Parties in Western Democracies," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(3), pages 997-1015, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:53:y:2023:i:3:p:997-1015_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123422000394/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:53:y:2023:i:3:p:997-1015_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.