IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v53y2023i1p104-121_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coalition Mood in European Parliamentary Democracies

Author

Listed:
  • Imre, Michael
  • Ecker, Alejandro
  • Meyer, Thomas M.
  • Müller, Wolfgang C.

Abstract

The success and longevity of coalition governments depends on the ability to keep conflicts between coalition members at bay. The risk of such conflicts is often assessed by drawing on proxy measures, such as the ideological heterogeneity among government parties. This article presents a new approach to measuring the atmosphere between government parties. The ‘coalition mood’ is a time-varying measure that draws on applause patterns between coalition partners during legislative debates. The article exemplifies the measurement approach based on automated analyses of over 105,000 plenary debates in Germany and Austria. The article then assesses the measure's face, concurrent and predictive validity. It finds the measure well aligned with qualitative evidence, shows that the coalition mood is correlated with poll ratings of the government parties and helps to predict the duration of legislative processes. The conclusion highlights future applications of the coalition mood for research on coalition politics and public policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Imre, Michael & Ecker, Alejandro & Meyer, Thomas M. & Müller, Wolfgang C., 2023. "Coalition Mood in European Parliamentary Democracies," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 104-121, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:53:y:2023:i:1:p:104-121_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123421000739/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:53:y:2023:i:1:p:104-121_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.