IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v52y2022i3p1409-1417_23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Populists Sore Losers? Explaining Populist Citizens' Preferences for and Reactions to Referendums

Author

Listed:
  • Werner, Hannah
  • Jacobs, Kristof

Abstract

Can referendums help increase perceived legitimacy among citizens with populist attitudes? Indeed, public opinion surveys show that populist citizens are especially in favour of referendums. However, we do not know whether this support reflects a principled desire for different decision-making procedures or an instrumental one (that is, because they expect referendums to yield favourable outcomes). We study this question on a real-life case: the Dutch 2018 referendum on the Intelligence and Security Services Act 2017. Using high-quality survey data from both before and after the referendum, we find that, counter to conventional wisdom and our hypotheses, populists' support for referendums is less driven by instrumental motives compared to that of non-populists, and that populists are more likely than non-populists to accept the outcome of a referendum, even when this outcome is unfavourable.

Suggested Citation

  • Werner, Hannah & Jacobs, Kristof, 2022. "Are Populists Sore Losers? Explaining Populist Citizens' Preferences for and Reactions to Referendums," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(3), pages 1409-1417, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:52:y:2022:i:3:p:1409-1417_23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123421000314/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:52:y:2022:i:3:p:1409-1417_23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.