IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v51y2021i4p1734-1741_22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Archived Attributes: An Internet-Text Approach to Measuring Legislator Attitudes and Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Gade, Emily Kalah
  • Dreier, Sarah
  • Wilkerson, John
  • Washington, Anne

Abstract

The Internet Archive curated a 90-terabyte sub-collection of captures from the US government's public website domain (‘.gov’). Such archives provide largely untapped resources for measuring attributes, behaviors and outcomes relevant to political science research. This study leverages this archive to measure a novel dimension of federal legislators' religiosity: their proportional use of religious rhetoric on official congressional websites (2006–2012). This scalable, time-variant measure improves upon more costly, time-invariant conventional approaches to measuring legislator attributes. The authors demonstrate the validity of this method for measuring legislators' public-facing religiosity and discuss the contributions and limitations of using archived Internet data for scientific analysis. This research makes three applied methodological contributions: (1) it develops a new measure for legislator religiosity, (2) it models an improved, more comprehensive approach to analyzing congressional communications and (3) it demonstrates the unprecedented potential that archived Internet data offer to researchers seeking to develop meaningful, cost-effective approaches to analyzing political phenomena.

Suggested Citation

  • Gade, Emily Kalah & Dreier, Sarah & Wilkerson, John & Washington, Anne, 2021. "Archived Attributes: An Internet-Text Approach to Measuring Legislator Attitudes and Behavior," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(4), pages 1734-1741, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:51:y:2021:i:4:p:1734-1741_22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123420000290/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:51:y:2021:i:4:p:1734-1741_22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.