IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v51y2021i4p1705-1722_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Extraordinary Relationship between Peacekeeping and Peace

Author

Listed:
  • Walter, Barbara F.
  • Howard, Lise Morje
  • Fortna, V. Page

Abstract

Numerous empirical studies have examined the role of third-party peacekeeping in reducing violence around the world. Their results reveal an extraordinary relationship between peacekeepers and peace, notwithstanding a number of well-known problems. This review article has three goals. The first is to summarize the results of past empirical research to move the debate beyond the question of whether peacekeeping works to the more pressing questions of how, when and why it works. The second is to reveal the limitations of the current quantitative research in order to identify areas in which scholars can make big, new contributions to the field. The final goal is to propose a new research agenda that is heavily evaluative – one that informs policy makers about the specific practices, mission compositions, and mandates that work, and identifies the local, regional, and international conditions that amplify or diminish peacekeeping's effectiveness. This type of research could help reduce the costs of peacekeeping operations, eliminate some of the negative consequences of interventions and save even more lives.

Suggested Citation

  • Walter, Barbara F. & Howard, Lise Morje & Fortna, V. Page, 2021. "The Extraordinary Relationship between Peacekeeping and Peace," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(4), pages 1705-1722, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:51:y:2021:i:4:p:1705-1722_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000712342000023X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gleditsch Kristian Skrede, 2023. "“This Research has Important Policy Implications…”," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 29(1), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Anke Hoeffler & Patricia Justino, 2023. "Aid and fragile states," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2023-83, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:51:y:2021:i:4:p:1705-1722_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.